When Madhurima went to the property registration office, the Registrar told her, “You can't write your name as Madhurima Banerjee d/o A.K. Banerjee. You are married, so you must give your husband's name. Your husband's surname is Rao. So your name should be changed to Madhurima Rao." She did not agree. She said "if my husband's name has not changed after marriage, why should mine?” In your opinion who is right in this dispute? And why?
In the above case, Madhurima is right because according to our fundamental right there is equality to everyone and she can write her name according to her wish. No one has the right to compel her to write Rao as her husband writes with his name.

Question

When Madhurima went to the property registration office, the Registrar told her, “You can't write your name as Madhurima Banerjee d/o A.K. Banerjee. You are married, so you must give your husband's name. Your husband's surname is Rao. So your name should be changed to Madhurima Rao." She did not agree. She said "if my husband's name has not changed after marriage, why should mine?” In your opinion who is right in this dispute? And why?

In the above case, Madhurima is right because according to our fundamental right there is equality to everyone and she can write her name according to her wish. No one has the right to compel her to write Rao as her husband writes with his name.

Philoid · Accepted Answer

In the above case, Madhurima is right because according to our fundamental right there is equality to everyone and she can write her name according to her wish. No one has the right to compel her to write Rao as her husband writes with his name.