The proposal says that there should be procedure to have an elected administration instead of an appointed administration would be detrimental. This proposal will create commotion if implemented. It takes a lot of knowledge of the nation for the executives to solve its problems and to implement policies according to its working. It is also important for the executive to shape its future prospect and to lay down various approaches towards them carefully. Only a person with deep knowledge of facts and analytical skills can make the possible programmes and policy of the government. Thus, skilled and knowledgeable candidates must be selected to ensure smooth working of the administration at the ground level. Not with the process of election but by various written exams that test the broad range of skills will help us choose the best eligible candidate for the administration. Other factors are time and money. More time and money would be needed in the election of the executives. The selection criteria to judge the candidates would become difficult. Electoral process is preferred by the legislatures because they provide representation to people in law making. Elected representative may seem effective at smaller level but large-scale administration requires an appointed administration. The elected administrators would bring instability to implement different policies. The civil servants are selected on the basis of merit without partiality. Thus, the welfare policies of the government can be effectively implemented without any political intrusion. The elected administration would have lack of technical knowledge of their departments while members of administration have full knowledge of their departments. They will be able to implement and perform the developmental functions also they will be able to perform the functions of planning and social welfare of the nation.