Read the news report below and identify the following aspects:
A. What is the case about?
B. Who has been the beneficiary in the case?
C. Who is the petitioner in the case?
D. Visualise what would have been the different arguments put forward by the company.
E. What arguments would the farmers have put forward?
Supreme Court orders REL to pay Rs 300 crore to Dahanu farmers
Our Corporate Bureau 24 March 2005
Mumbai: The Supreme Court has ordered Reliance Energy to pay Rs. 300 crore to farmers who grow the chikoo fruit in the Dahanu area outside Mumbai. The order comes after the chikoo growers petitioned the court against the pollution caused by Reliance’s thermal power plant.
Dahanu, which is 150 km from Mumbai, was a self-sustaining agricultural and horticultural economy known for its fisheries and forests just over a decade ago, but was devastated in 1989 when a thermal power plant came into operation in the region. The next year, this fertile belt saw its first crop failure. Now, 70 per cent of the crop of what was once the fruit bowl of Maharashtra is gone. The fisheries have shut and the forest cover has thinned. Farmers and environmentalists say that fly ash from the power plant entered ground water and polluted the entire eco-system. The Dahanu Taluka Environment Protection Authority ordered the thermal station to set up a pollution control unit to reduce sulphur emissions, and in spite of a Supreme Court order backing the order the pollution control plant was not set up even by 2002. In 2003, Reliance acquired the thermal station and re-submitted a schedule for installation process in 2004. As the pollution control plant is still not set up, the Dahanu Taluka Environmental Protection Authority asked Reliance for a bank guarantee of Rs. 300 crores.
A. The case discuss about the loss that was made to the farmers in the production of chikoo, because of the pollution generated by the thermal power plant of Reliance Energy.
B. The farmers were the beneficiary in the case.
C. The chikoo growing farmers are the petitioner in the case.
D. The different arguments could be:
1. The power plants could be set up far from the town or village in order to keep the effects of pollution at bay.
2. The power plants helped the villagers by providing employment to masses.
E. The arguments could be:
1. The loss of chikoo production has adversely affected agriculture and the economy of the region.
2. The increased pollution has caused health issues in the region.